Legal Pad provides yesterday's discovery order by Judge Vaugn Walker in the Perry case. (Thanks to this site's co-author Rick for advance notice of the order.) Walker has ordered defendant-intervenors to disclose contested communications among political consultants, directors, and managers of the Yes on 8 campaign. Defendant-intervenors must also produce communications about the campaign's proposed or implemented messages to voters.
As has been widely reported, the Yes on 1 campaign in Maine has engaged Schubert Flint Public Affairs, which was a chief consultant and strategist for Yes on 8. Based on a magazine article by the firm's principals, Judge Walker ruled that the firm's campaign communications do not warrant First Amendment protection:
If harm is threatened from disclosure of proponents’ campaign strategy, it seems likely to have been realized by the candid description of the Prop 8 campaign’s strategy already disseminated by [principals Frank] Schubert and [Jeff] Flint.Discovery just might turn up explosive, or at least sensational, revelations about development of strategy by the firm and organizers of the Yes on 8 campaign, with potential ramifications for the campaigns in Maine over Question 1. As journalist Karen Ocamb observes, "Walker ... hinted that he might limit the public’s access to the documents."
I would expect defendant-intervenors to demand the same scope of discovery from plaintiffs with respect to the No on 8 campaign.
No comments:
Post a Comment