Sunday, January 10, 2010

Perry plaintiffs and Media Coalition respond to Prop. proponents' emergency application to stay YouTube of Perry trial

Response of Kristin M. Perry to application for stay [of YouTube of Perry trial], filed 01-10-10, Hollingsworth, et al., v. U.S. District Court, No. 09A648 (U.S.)

Opposition by non-party Media Coalition to application for immediate stay of the District Court's order permitting public broadcast of trial proceedings, filed 01-10-10, Hollingsworth, et al., v. U.S. District Court, No. 09A648 (U.S.)


Application for immediate stay of the District Court's order permitting public broadcat of trial proceedings, filed 01-09-10, Hollingsworth, et al., v. U.S. District Court, No. 09A648 (U.S.)

Read this SCOTUS post and this Legal Times post about the latest development on whether the Perry trial will be broadcast through YouTube. Law professor John Culhane comments on the apparent motivation of Prop. 8 proponents for trying to stay the broadcast.

Thanks to Michael for alerting me to the filings!

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

The Supreme Court has issued a stay over the dissent of Justice Breyer. The broadcast is prohibited at least until Wednesday, while the trial starts as planned.

http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/delay-in-broadcast-of-prop-8-trial/

Commentators, Subjects and Cases